A few of our very own foregoing considerations offer credence with the assertion you to metaphor was an analogous name. It is corroborated by St Thomas’ techniques in question 13 from the fresh Prima Pars , while the during the post three, as he requires if any name is said safely of God, the latest opposition put into the enjoy are ranging from usage proprie and you may improprie with the latter known which have metaphor. After that, inside article half a dozen, when he requires in the event the brands prominent so you can Jesus and pets is first told you of animals, brand new differences proprie/improprie is apparently good subdivision of analogous identity. St Thomas begins from the stating that « inside omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur each respectum advertising unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur in the definitione omnium. Mais aussi quia ratio quam significat nomen per prius dicitur de eo quod ponitur in the definitione aliorum, mais aussi for every posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant advertising illud primum vel magis vel minus. » This might be exemplified of the dated reputable, « match. » « Sic ergo omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur for each prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud significant quam similitudines advertisement reports creaturas. » St. Thomas notices this new resemblance away from proportion ( similitudo proportionum ) intended in the « cheerful meadow » along with calling God a beneficial lion.
As he continues to talk of almost every other names « quae non metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo, » the latest obvious perception is the fact they are talking out-of almost every other times away from analogous names than metaphors
Are there messages in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you will analogy? When we check out the brand new feedback into the Metaphysics , we find St Thomas distinguishing « potency » to the analogous and you may equivocal modes. « Potency » setting a number of things. « Sed ista multiplicitas quantum ad quosdam analogiae. » The fresh equivocal settings from potency try exemplified incidentally we speak of step https://essayrevisor.com/academic-writing-service/ three into the 3rd energy and of the newest cube given that power of your range. « Et propter hoc for each quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens inside quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens when you look at the rem » Once more a good proportionality see. That these equivocal modes really are metaphors is clear in the parallel passageway in book Delta when you look at the posting comments on which St Thomas initiate, « Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice. » Exactly why are such modes metaphorical rather than analogical? « His therefore modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertising unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, mais aussi omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur offer aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur. » Simply speaking, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor to help you analogous spends away from a name given that latter rather than the former involve a reduction so you’re able to what’s generally denominated because of the word concerned while, is always to it you want mentioning, regarding the text of your own Summa i sensed the next back, the fresh new metaphor wasn’t celebrated in the expansion proprie with this basis. Or is it the way in which of one’s regard to what exactly is principally signifed by title hence distinguishes metaphor of analogy, need proprie out-of improprie ? Anything entitled metaphorically try, after all, delivered to end up being just like just what label safely means.
Whatever you is going to be interested in is a few technique for justifying new very well-known variation out-of metaphor and example in a way that zero focus was designed to Cajetan’s division out-of analogy on attribution and you can proper proportionality
An aporia possess clearly emerged, thus, and its particular resolution could only become got of the choosing just what an excellent metaphor is and you can just what an enthusiastic analogous name is. Methods to these inquiries is enable me to comprehend the seem to conflicting statements off Aquinas.